Implementation of risk management in a public health laboratory

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22239/2317-269X.01319

Keywords:

Risk Management, Quality Improvement, Public Health Laboratory

Abstract

Introduction: Managing risks means, in the case of risks with negative effects, having them under control to mitigate or eliminate them, if possible, or in the case of risks with positive effects, turning them into opportunities. The Adolfo Lutz Institute (IAL) establishes documents and implements and maintains a management system in accordance with option A of ISO/IEC 17025: 2017. Thus, risk management is one of the requirements to be met. In order to fulfill this requirement, the IAL started the implementation of the risk management process using the Failure Mode, Effect and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) tool. As the methodology was considered complex by the collaborators, this tool was abandoned and only the brainstorming was used for the identification step, and the probability and impact analysis at the risk analysis for the assessment stage. Objective: To assess the level of implementation of the risk management process in the IAL and identify the main difficulties involved in this process. Method: 74 risk matrix forms filled out by the various sectors of the institution were analyzed. Results: There was a 76.3% adherence to the implementation of risk management and the main difficulties encountered in the risk management process were: identification of the risks, including identification of risks with positive effects, selection of an indicator associated with risk, and proposal of actions to treat risks. Conclusions: To implement the risk management process, the use of simpler tools should be recommended when the team maturity level is still low or intermediate. Another point to be considered for the successful implementation of this process is strengthening of the understanding of risks by everyone in the organization. In IAL, the risk management process is in the risk monitoring phase; the next step is to review the risk mapping initially done.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Carmen Silvia Kira, Instituto Adolfo Lutz (IAL), São Paulo, SP, Brasil

    Possui graduação em Química (Bacharelado) com extensão universitária em Química Tecnológica pela Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho - UNESP (1990), mestrado em Ciências (área de Tecnologia Nuclear- Aplicações) pelo Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares - IPEN (2002) e doutorado em Ciências na área de Medicina Preventiva pela Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (2014). Atualmente é Pesquisador Científico VI do Instituto Adolfo Lutz. Tem experiência na área de Química Analítica, com ênfase em métodos espectroscópicos de análise (espectrometria de absorção atômica, espectrometria de emissão atômica com plasma de argônio indutivamente acoplado e espectrometria de massa) aplicados à determinação de constituintes inorgânicos em amostras de alimentos e materiais biológicos, atuando principalmente nos seguintes temas: alimentos, minerais, elementos-traço, contaminação ambiental, saúde humana e saúde coletiva.

  • Larissa Germano Fonseca, Instituto Adolfo Lutz (IAL), São Paulo, SP, Brasil

    Bolsista do curso de Especialização do Instituto Adolfo Lutz em Vigilância Laboratorial em Saúde Pública na área de Gestão da Qualidade. Graduada em Engenharia Química pela Universidade Federal de São João del Rei - Campus Alto Paraopeba. Participou do Grupo de Pesquisa "Nanotec" como aluna voluntária de iniciação científica e foi vice-diretora da Diretoria de Relações Escola-Empresa do Centro Acadêmico de Engenharia Química (CAEQ), na gestão 2015-2016. Experiência profissional como estagiária na Vida Biotecnologia S.A.

Published

2020-02-27

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Implementation of risk management in a public health laboratory. (2020). Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology , 8(1), 31-39. https://doi.org/10.22239/2317-269X.01319