Can the vaccination against COVID-19 be compulsory in Brazil? The legal issue and political dispute

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22239/2317-269x.01856

Keywords:

Right to Health; Coronavirus Infections; Public Health; Immunization Programs; Vaccination Refusal

Abstract

Introduction: The recent uproar around COVID-19 hangs over the rights and duties of the population regarding vaccination and mass immunization. The exercise of individual freedom and the possible imposition of a measure that makes vaccination compulsory may be the focus of a political dispute around the adoption of scientific criteria for government decision-making, and with that, bring serious collective consequences in relation to the spread and the lack of control of the disease. Objective: To study whether compulsory vaccination against COVID-19, once instituted by law or normative act, will have a legal basis in view of fundamental rights and analyze whether the political dispute around the vaccine may be influencing its regulation. Method:  Exploratory and descriptive study developed through documentary and bibliographic research, collection of texts from the World Health Organization, Ministry of Health, federal government and the state of São Paulo, analysis of national legislation and recent decisions by the  Supreme Court. Results: It was observed that it is possible to establish compulsory vaccination in Brazil, ensuring fundamental rights; however, political issues are influencing decision-making based on technical-scientific criteria for health surveillance. Conclusions:  The restriction of individual freedom finds support in the search for health in the collective interest, as long as it does not go beyond the limits of the physical integrity of the citizen and human dignity, the use of physical coercion being prohibited. The political dispute led by some public agents may have caused delays and setbacks in the vaccination of the Brazilian population, an effective way to control the pandemic.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Carol de Oliveira Abud, Universidade Santa Cecília (Unisanta), Santos, SP, Brasil

    Advogada, professora universitária, Mestra em Direito da Saúde pelo PPG Stricto Sensu em Direito da Saúde: dimensões individuais e coletivas da Universidade Santa Cecília, pesquisadora do grupo CNPq\UNISANTA Direitos humanos e desenvolvimento sustentável, pesquisadora do grupo CNPq\UNISANTA Direito da Saúde, relações contratuais, condicionantes ambientais, tutela penal e regulação, ex-bolsista CAPES/PROSUP, MBA em Gestão Empresarial pela Fundação Getúlio Vargas, professora da Escola de Direito EAD UNISANTA, consultora jurídica do escritório Themis de Oliveira Advocacia na capital paulista. Atuante em Direito da Saúde, Direito Médico, Direitos Humanos, Direito Civil, Responsabilidade Civil e Direito do Consumidor.

  • Luciano Pereira de Souza, Universidade Santa Cecília (Unisanta), Santos, SP, Brasil

    Luciano Pereira de Souza, Bacharelado e Licenciatura Plena em Ciências Biológicas (USP, 1989) e Bacharelado em Direito (USP, 1994), Mestre em Direito (USP, 2000). Doutor em Direito Ambiental Internacional (Unisantos, 2017). Professor Permanente do Programa de Pós-Graduação stricto sensu em Direito da Saúde da Universidade Santa Cecília (UNISANTA).Professor visitante da Escola Superior da Advocacia em Santos. Atua na área de Direito Penal Ambiental.

Published

2021-11-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Can the vaccination against COVID-19 be compulsory in Brazil? The legal issue and political dispute. (2021). Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology , 9(4), 4-15. https://doi.org/10.22239/2317-269x.01856