A decade of improvement of health legislation for medical devices and its impacts on the health regulation cycle
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22239/2317-269x.02104Keywords:
Medical Device, Sanitary Regulation, AnvisaAbstract
Introduction: The sanitary regulation of medical devices was improved with a focus on sanitary risk, through the simplification of regulatory steps and the reduction of the administrative burden. Objective: To evaluate the impacts of the improvement of health legislation during the decade 2012-2021 by three indicators representing government, company, and product. Method: The indicators developed to evaluate the health regulation cycle are 1) Anvisa’s regulatory performance (by median evaluation time of medical devices); 2) companies’ performance in complying with health legislation (by proportion of medical devices not authorized for sale); and 3) evidence of medical device health risk (due to adverse events, technical complaints, health alerts and preventive/cautionary measures). Influence analyses were carried out with variables associated with regulatory process, company size and medical device characteristics as predictors of the indicators. Results: The first indicator shows that the Agency’s timing has improved across all risk classes of medical devices. In 2012, the indicator was measured in 73 days (interquartile range 56–111), while in 2021 in 9 days (interquartile range 6–15). The second indicator showed improvement only for medical devices in the low/medium risk classes. The third indicator did not show an increase in health risk for medical devices with the regulatory simplifications adopted in the last decade. The influence analysis indicates that the need for a certificate of good manufacturing practices, company size and need for additional information are the most relevant predictor variables. Conclusions: The regulatory results from the legislation on medical devices in the last decade were positive.
Downloads
References
World Health Organization (WHO), “WHO Global Model Regulatory Framework for Medical Devices including in vitro diagnostic medical devices. WHO Medical device technical series.,” 2017.
Rede Brasileira de Avaliação de Tecnologias em Saúde, “WebRebrats - Dispositivos médicos monitoramento econômico e pós incorporação,” 29 04 2022. [Online]. Disponível em: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9_beqkbsUg&t=1458s. [Acesso em 26 05 2022].
Statista, “Medical Technology,” [Online]. Disponível em: https://www.statista.com/outlook/hmo/medical-technology/brazil. [Acesso em 25 05 2022].
Brasil, “Lei 9.872, de 26 de janeiro de 1999,” 27 01 1999. [Online]. Disponível em: http://legislacao.planalto.gov.br/legisla/legislacao.nsf/Viw_Identificacao/lei 9.782-1999?OpenDocument.
Brasil, Portaria no 1.052, de 8 de maio de 2007, Ministério da Saúde, 2006.
Organização Mundial da Saúde, “WHO Global Benchmarking Tool (GBT) for evaluation of national regulatory systems,” 10 05 2021. [Online]. Disponível em: https://www.who.int/tools/global-benchmarking-tools.
Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária, “Biblioteca de produtos para a saúde,” 12 05 2022. [Online]. Disponível em: https://www.gov.br/anvisa/pt-br/assuntos/regulamentacao/legislacao/bibliotecas-tematicas/arquivos/produtos. [Acesso em 26 05 2022].
Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária, “Consulta de Nomes Técnicos de Produtos para Saúde,” [Online]. Disponível em: https://consultas.anvisa.gov.br/#/nomes-tecnicos/.
Microsoft Corporation, “Power BI identifies key influencers using ML.NET,” 01 02 2019. [Online]. Disponível em: https://dotnet.microsoft.com/en-us/apps/machinelearning-ai/ml-dotnet/customers/power-bi.
Receita Federal do Brasil, “Dados Públicos CNPJ,” 12 07 2022. [Online]. Disponível em: https://www.gov.br/receitafederal/pt-br/assuntos/orientacao-tributaria/cadastros/consultas/dados-publicos-cnpj.
Australian government. Department of Health. Therapeutic Goods Administration, “Report on TGA processes and timeframes for the regulation of medical devices and access to market - International benchmarking,” 11 2019. [Online]. Disponível em: https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/medical-device-application-processing-times-report.pdf. [Acesso em 11 09 2020].
M. Coelho Adati, Á. da Silva Ribeiro, C. de Assis Cirilo, D. Copello Vigo, D. Custódio Deslandes do Passo, G. Pires da Silva Macedo, J. Roberto Niemeyer de Castro, L. Vieira Teixeira, M. Melo da Silva e et.al, “Monitoramento pós-mercado dos testes rápidos para Covid-19: enfretamento da pandemia,” Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia, vol. 9, nº 3, pp. 91-101, 2021.
Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária, “Webinares: produtos para a saúde,” 2019. [Online]. Disponível em: https://www.gov.br/anvisa/pt-br/assuntos/educacaoepesquisa/webinar.
Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária, “Formulários de notificação de dispositivos médicos,” [Online]. Disponível em: https://www.gov.br/anvisa/pt-br/setorregulado/regularizacao/produtos-para-saude/notificacao/formularios-de-notificacao.
Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária, “Guia sobre a Especificação da Documentação para o Peticionamento Eletrônico de Dispositivos Médicos,” 2021.
Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária, “Exercício de mensuração da carga administrativa da RDC nº 185/2006: um estudo-piloto,” 2018.
Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária, “Ação de campo e alerta Sanitário - Tecnovigilância,” 23 12 2021. [Online]. Disponível em: https://www.gov.br/anvisa/pt-br/acessoainformacao/dadosabertos/informacoes-analiticas/tecnovigilancia/acao-de-campo-e-alerta-sanitario-tecnovigilancia.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OCDE), “Review of Regulatory Reform of Brazil,” 21 06 2022. [Online]. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1787/d81c15d7-en.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Leidy Anne Alves Teixeira, Hélio Bomfim de Macêdo Filho (Autor)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
COPYRIGHT ALLOWANCE The author (s) hereinafter designated as the ASSIGNOR hereby assign and transfer, free of charge, the ownership of the copyrights related to this ARTICLE to the Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debate, represented by FUNDAÇÃO OSWALDO CRUZ, established at Av. Brasil, nº 4365, Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, CEP 21045-900, under the conditions set out below: (a) The terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement shall apply to the following: 1. The ASSIGNOR declares that they s(he) is (are) the author (s) and owner (s) of the copyrighted property of the ARTICLE submitted. 2. The ASSIGNOR declares that the ARTICLE does not infringe the copyrights and / or other property rights of third parties, that the disclosure of images (if any) has been authorized and that they s(he) assume(s) full moral and / or property liability for its content, before third parties. 3. THE ASSIGNOR assigns and transfers all copyrights relating to the ARTICLE to the ASSIGNEE, especially the rights of editing, publication, translation into another language and reproduction by any process or technique. The ASSIGNEE becomes the exclusive owner of the rights related to the ARTICLE, and any reproduction, totally or partially, is prohibited in any other means of publicity, printed or electronic, without prior written authorization from the ASSIGNEE. 4. The assignment is free and, therefore, there will be no remuneration for the use of the ARTICLE by the ASSIGNEE.