Study of the difficulties encountered by Brazilian laboratories inimplementing alternative methods to animal use: assessment of Ocular Irritation and the Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) test

Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro, 2024, v.12: e02283 | Published on: 15/10/2024

Authors

  • Izabela Gimenes Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências e Biotecnologia, Instituto de Biologia, Campus Gragoatá, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ, Brasil | Laboratório de Farmacologia, Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (INCQS/Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil Author https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5319-1179
  • Octavio Augusto França Presgrave Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências e Biotecnologia, Instituto de Biologia, Campus Gragoatá, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ, Brasil | Centro Brasileiro de Validação de Métodos Alternativos (BraCVAM), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1764-9397
  • Marcelo Salabert Gonzalez Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências e Biotecnologia, Instituto de Biologia, Campus Gragoatá, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ, Brasil | Laboratório de Biologia de Insetos, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ, Brasil Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5442-6440
  • Gutemberg Gomes Alves Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências e Biotecnologia, Instituto de Biologia, Campus Gragoatá, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ, Brasil | Departamento de Biologia Celular e Molecular, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ, Brasil Author https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0016-4809

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22239/2317-269X.02283

Keywords:

Alternative Methods, Toxicological Tests, Eye Irritation, BCOP, Interview

Abstract

Introduction: Ensuring the safety of products causing ocular irritation is crucial. The Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) test is an accepted alternative method for ocular irritation assessment in regulatory contexts. Objective: This study aimed to identify the main challenges and technical limitations faced by professionals when implementing alternative methods, particularly for ocular irritation assessment. Method: A qualitative research approach was employed using questionnaires (n = 22 respondents) and interviews (n = 7), followed by discourse analysis. Results: Findings reveal that 71% of alternative method practitioners encounter significant difficulties, primarily due to high validation/implementation costs (62%), driven by consumable expenses. Limited access to training (62%) and importation of reagents and equipment (43%) were also noted. Key BCOP limitations include restricted access to bovine eyeballs (50%), less precise risk classification (43%), and substantial eyeball waste (29%) due to damage. Interviews supported these conclusions, highlighting challenges such as travel to slaughterhouses, insufficient technical details in the OECD Guide, the need for additional support materials, and a lack of experienced professionals. These results underscore the need for expanded training opportunities for test implementation. The high cost of imported materials indicates greater validation expenses in Brazil than in other countries. Conclusions: Addressing these challenges requires an open innovation environment, fostering collaboration among the Triple Helix (Companies, Scientific and Technological Institutions, and Government).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Izabela Gimenes , Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências e Biotecnologia, Instituto de Biologia, Campus Gragoatá, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ, Brasil | Laboratório de Farmacologia, Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (INCQS/Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
  • Octavio Augusto França Presgrave, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências e Biotecnologia, Instituto de Biologia, Campus Gragoatá, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ, Brasil | Centro Brasileiro de Validação de Métodos Alternativos (BraCVAM), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
  • Marcelo Salabert Gonzalez, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências e Biotecnologia, Instituto de Biologia, Campus Gragoatá, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ, Brasil | Laboratório de Biologia de Insetos, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ, Brasil
  • Gutemberg Gomes Alves, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências e Biotecnologia, Instituto de Biologia, Campus Gragoatá, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ, Brasil | Departamento de Biologia Celular e Molecular, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ, Brasil

Published

2024-10-15

How to Cite

Study of the difficulties encountered by Brazilian laboratories inimplementing alternative methods to animal use: assessment of Ocular Irritation and the Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) test: Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro, 2024, v.12: e02283 | Published on: 15/10/2024. (2024). Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology , 12, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.22239/2317-269X.02283

Similar Articles

1-10 of 301

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.