Medication error notifications in Primary Health Care of a Brazilian capital: an analysis from the perspective of patient safety

Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro, 2025, v.13: e02383 | Published on: 01/12/2025

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22239/2317-269X.02383

Keywords:

Medication Errors, Patient Safety, Primary Health Care, Risk Management

Abstract

Introduction: Medication errors are preventable events that may lead to inappropriate medication use and are associated with various stages of the medication process, including prescribing, dispensing, and administration. Such errors can result in severe clinical consequences for patients and impose significant financial burdens on healthcare systems. While most data on the frequency and impact of medication errors come from hospital-based studies, research on these errors in Primary Health Care (PHC) remains scarce. Objective: This study aimed to analyze medication error reports originating from PHC in the Unified Health System (SUS) in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Methods: An exploratory and descriptive study was conducted using a quantitative approach. A total of 1,174 reports filed in the Municipal Notification System between February 2020 and February 2023 were analyzed. Results: The most frequent errors were dispensing errors (73.0%), followed by prescribing errors (23.0%) and medication administration errors (4.0%), primarily involving antihypertensives, antidiabetics, and anticonvulsants. The most common error was dispensing the wrong medication to the patient. Most cases occurred in women (60.0%), with a predominance in the age group of > 60 years (37.4%). Although most errors did not harm patients (96.3%), mild (2.6%) and severe (1.1%) adverse events, including one fatal case, were reported. Among the errors with mild consequences, 25.0% involved potentially dangerous medications. In severe cases, this proportion reached 38.0%. Conclusions: This study showed that the most frequently reported medication errors in PHC in Belo Horizonte were related to the dispensing stage, with a greater impact on women and the elderly. Although most errors did not result in harm, the occurrence of adverse events—including one death—and the high association with hazardous medications highlight the need for improvements in dispensing processes, high-risk medication protocols, and targeted strategies for vulnerable groups to enhance patient safety in PHC units. In this context, the implementation of Patient Safety Centers stands out as an essential strategy to organize care and promote necessary changes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

References

1. World Health Organization – WHO. Medication errors: technical series on safer primary care. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016[acesso 6 jan 2022]. Disponível em: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/252274

2. World Health Organization – WHO. Medication without harm: global patient safety challenge on medication safety. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017[acesso 6 jan 2022]. Disponível em: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/255263/WHO-HIS-DS-2017.6eng.pd.

3. World Health Organization – WHO. Global patient safety action plan 2021–2030: towards eliminating avoidable harm in health care. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021[acesso 31 ago 2022]. Disponível em: https://www. who.int/teams/integrated-healthservices/patient-safety/policy/global-patient-safety-action-plan

4. Goedecke T, Ord K, Newbould V, Brosch S, Arlett P. Medication errors: new EU good practice guide on risk minimisation and error prevention. Drug Saf. 2016;39:491-500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-016-0410-4

5. Assiri GA, Shebl NA, Mahmoud MA, Aloudah N, Grant E, Aljadhey H, Sheikh A. What is the epidemiology of medication errors, error-related adverse events and risk factors for errors in adults managed in community care contexts? A systematic review of the international literature. BMJ Open. 2018;8(5):1-31.https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019101

6. Marchon SG, Mendes Junior WV. Patient safety in primary health care: a systematic review. Cad Saúde Pública. 2014;30(9):1815-35.https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00114113

7. Elliott RA, Camacho E, Jankovic D, Sculpher MJ, Faria R. Economic analysis of the prevalence and clinical and economic burden of medication error in England. BMJ Qual Saf. 2021;30(2):96-105.https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010206

8. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária – Anvisa. Protocolo de segurança na prescrição, uso e administração de medicamentos. Brasília: Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária; 2013[acesso 12 jan 2022]. Disponível em:https://www20.anvisa.gov.br/segurancadopaciente/index.php/pub licacoes/item/seguranca-na-prescricao-uso-eadministracao- de-medicamentos

9. National Coordinating Council For Medication Error Reporting And Prevention – NCCMERP. Types of medication errors. Rockville:National Coordinating Council For Medication Error Reporting And Prevention; 2022[acesso 16 maio 2022]. Disponível em: https://www.nccmerp.org/types-medication-errors

10. Faria JCM, Nascimento MMG, Anacleto TA. Medicamentos potencialmente perigosos de uso ambulatorial e para instituições de longa permanência - listas atualizadas -2022. Belo Horizonte: Instituto para Práticas Seguras no Uso de Medicamentos; 2022[acesso 10 jun 2023]. Disponível em: https://www.ismp-brasil.org/site/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/MEDICAMENTOS-POTENCIALMENTEPERIGOSOS-LISTAS-ATUALIZADAS-2022.pdf

11. Perini E, Faria JCM, Nascimento MMG, Rosa MB, Anacleto TA. Medicamentos potencialmente perigosos de uso hospitalar e ambulatorial: listas atualizadas 2015. Belo Horizonte: Instituto para Práticas Seguras no Uso de Medicamentos; 2015[acesso 10 jul 2023]. Disponível em: https://www.ismp-brasil.org/site/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/V4N3.pdf

12. Rezende CP, Caon S, Anacleto TA. Segurança de rótulos e embalagens de medicamentos. Belo Horizonte: Instituto para Práticas Seguras no Uso de Medicamentos; 2023[acesso 19 jun 2023]. Disponível em: https://www.ismp-brasil.org/site/wpcontent/uploads/2023/04/Boletim_ISMP_Brasil_Rotulos-e-embalagens.pdf

13. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária – Anvisa. Protocolo de segurança na prescrição, uso e Administração de Medicamentos. Brasília: Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária; 2013[acesso 23 nov 2021]. Disponível em: https://www20.anvisa.gov.br/segurancadopaciente/index.php/publicacoes/item/seguranca-na-prescricao-uso-e-administracao-de-medicamentos

14. Bibiano AMB, Moreira RS, Tenório MMGO, Silva VL.Fatores associados à utilização dos serviços de saúde por homens idosos: uma revisão sistemática da literatura. Ciênc Saúde Colet. 2019;24(6):2263-78.https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232018246.19552017

15. Cândido RCF, Detoni KB, Rezende CP, Silva HM. Prevenção de erros de medicação na transição do cuidado. Belo Horizonte: Instituto para Práticas Seguras no Uso de Medicamentos; 2019[acesso 10 jun 2023]. Disponível em: https://www.ismpbrasil.org/site/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/boletim_ismp_30a_edicao.pdf

16. Santana BS, Rodrigues BS, Stival MM, Rehem TCMSB, Lima LR, Volpe CRG. Interrupções no trabalho da enfermagem como fator de risco para erros de medicação. Avan Enferm. 2019;37(1):56-64.https://doi.org/10.15446/av.enferm.v37n1.71178

17. Mieiro DB, Oliveira EBC, Fonseca REP, Mininel VA, Zem-Mascarenhas SH, Machado RC. Strategies to minimize medication errors in emergency units: an integrative review. Rev Bras Enferm. 2019;72:307-14.https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0658

18. Manias, E et al. Interventions to reduce medication errors in adult medical and surgical settings: a systematic review. Adv Drug Saf. 2020;11:1-29.https://doi.org/10.1177/2042098620968309

19. Batson S, Herranz A, Rohrbach N, Canobbio M, Mitchell SA, Bonnabry P. Automation of in-hospital pharmacy dispensing: a systematic review. Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2021;28(2):58-64.https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2019-002081

20. Damiani G, Altamura G, Zedda M, Nurchis MC, Aulino G, Heidar Alizadeh A et al. Potentiality of algorithms and artificial intelligence adoption to improve medication management in primary care: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2023;13(3):1-9.https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065301

Published

2025-12-12

Issue

Section

Original Article

Categories

How to Cite

Medication error notifications in Primary Health Care of a Brazilian capital: an analysis from the perspective of patient safety: Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro, 2025, v.13: e02383 | Published on: 01/12/2025. (2025). Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology , 13, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.22239/2317-269X.02383