Alternative approaches for cutaneous leishmaniasis surveillance in indigenous areas - case study among the Amapá Wajãpi people

Authors

  • Eduardo Stramandinoli Moreno Universidade Federal do Oeste do Pará (Ufopa), Santarém, PA Author
  • Joana Oliveira Cabral Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo (USP). São Paulo, SP Author
  • Maira Posteraro Freire Universidade Federal do Amazonas/Instituto Leônidas e Maria Deane (ILMD) - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Manaus, AM Author
  • Alline da Silva Costa Distrito Sanitário Especial Indígena (DSEI) – Amapá e Norte do Pará – Secretaria Especial de Saúde Indígena - Ministério da Saúde, Macapá, AP Author
  • Tiago da Silva Costa Universidade Federal do Amapá (UNIFAP), Macapá, AP Author
  • Raimundo Nonato Picanço Souto Universidade Federal do Amapá (UNIFAP), Macapá, AP Author
  • Isai Jorge Castro Instituto de Pesquisa Científicas e Tecnológicas do Estado do Amapá (IEPA), Macapá, AP Author
  • Luis Otavio Cordeiro Nascimento Laboratório Central de Saúde Pública do Amapá – (LACEN- AP), Macapá, AP Author
  • Volmir Zanini Laboratório Central de Saúde Pública do Amapá – (LACEN- AP), Macapá, AP Author
  • Paloma Helena Fernandes Shimabukuro Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou (CPqRR) – Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Macapá, AP Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22239/2317-269X.00809

Keywords:

Amazon, Leishmaniasis, Interdisciplinary Research, Health of Indigenous Populations, Health Evaluation

Abstract

This paper aims to present the limitations of the surveillance system for cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) overseen by the Ministry of Health in Brazil in indigenous areas, based on the accounts of technical experts and collaborators who worked on the surveillance of the disease among the Wajãpi indigenous people between 2012 and 2015. The study compares the standard approaches recommended by the Ministry of Health with alternative approaches in three main areas: case detection and diagnosis, treatment, and epidemiological analysis. In the latter area, methods that relate to risk analysis, entomology and the study of vertebrate hosts were compared. The comparison showed that approaches based on qualitative methods and knowledge about cultural patterns and specificities of the indigenous group increased the acceptability of the health service. Integrative approaches such as participatory community workshops involving community members acting as reporting agents working within the health service proved to be important alternatives for improving the sensitivity and representativeness of the CL monitoring system in indigenous areas. It is expected that the approaches compared in this study can form the basis for improvement in health surveillance systems, particularly for vector-borne diseases in indigenous areas.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2016-11-25

How to Cite

Alternative approaches for cutaneous leishmaniasis surveillance in indigenous areas - case study among the Amapá Wajãpi people. (2016). Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology , 4(4), 51-59. https://doi.org/10.22239/2317-269X.00809