Assessment of penalties in pharmacies of the city of Goiânia-GO

Authors

  • Adriana Delcy de Oliveira Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), Goiânia, GO Author
  • Nathalie de Lourdes Souza Dewulf Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), Goiânia, GO Author
  • Danielle Guimarães Almeida Diniz Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), Goiânia, GO Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22239/2317-269X.00936

Keywords:

Health Surveillance, Pharmacy, Penalty

Abstract

Health surveillance has the objective of preventing and reducing risks to individual and collective health. Due to the health hazard inherent to the manipulation activity, the manipulation pharmacies are subject to health surveillance.This study purpose was to characterize the number of sanitary penalties applied to manipulation pharmacies in Goiânia-GO from 2010 to 2015. The number of penalties issued by the Municipal Health Surveillance of Goiânia-GO, as well as the existence of interrelationship between the characterized aspects, were analyzed using a quantitative, retrospective and analytical perspective.  Through the collected data independent (number of pharmacists, number of annual self-inspections, class membership, property) and dependents variables (fines, seizures, prohibitions and warnings) were defined. The results indicated that pharmacies: which had a large number of pharmacists suffered fewer penalties; that carried out self-inspection suffered fewer fines; and that are affiliated to class institutions suffered a minor number of interdictions. It was also noted thatthe fact that the owner was a pharmacist raised the technical quality of the establishment. The study pointed out that the smaller the number of assessments, seizures and interdictions separately, the lower the total number of penalties.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2017-05-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Assessment of penalties in pharmacies of the city of Goiânia-GO. (2017). Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology , 5(2), 42-52. https://doi.org/10.22239/2317-269X.00936