Organ-on-a-chip technology: assessing the global landscape of applicability in the regulatory context of pharmaceutical products
Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro, 2025, v.13: e02311 | Published on: 12/03/2025
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22239/2317-269X.02311Keywords:
Microphysiological System, Organ-on-a-Chip, Organs-on-Chip, Human on-a-Chip, New Approach MethodsAbstract
Introduction: Traditional preclinical studies using animals may not accurately reflect the efficacy and safety of compounds in humans. Therefore, the search for alternative methods and predictive strategies that offer advantages in terms of reliability, cost reduction, and ease of diffusion and adoption by laboratories is of great relevance, as well as ethical issues surrounding the use of animals. In this context, “organ-on-a-chip” (OoC) technology has been proposed as one of the alternatives to the use of laboratory animals. Although OoC technology is on the path to becoming widely accepted as a specific platform for preclinical research for human application and therapeutic testing, challenges and limitations remain to its regulatory acceptance. Objective: To address the technology’s applicability and regulatory acceptance by comparing Brazil with the United States of America (USA) and the European Union (EU) based on registered patent applications, a literature review, and data from official websites. Method: Data was collected through searches in the CAPES portal of journals, the PatentScope database managed by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), the websites of regulatory agencies, companies that commercialize OoC, societies discussing this technology, and the TSAR tool. Results: Patents related to the fields of microfluidics, OoC, and microphysiological systems (MPS) have been filed. It was observed that pharmaceutical companies are evaluating and applying this technology, indicating that the market is likely to grow, although this technology is not yet included in official regulatory acceptance guidelines. Conclusions: These results demonstrate the potential to overcome the limitations of current models. However, to promote the inclusion of OoC as a globally recognized predictive method, mobilizing universities, industries, research centers, financial support institutions, and regulatory bodies in a collaborative effort is essential, combining scientific knowledge, regulatory guidelines, and investment in research and training.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
COPYRIGHT ALLOWANCE The author (s) hereinafter designated as the ASSIGNOR hereby assign and transfer, free of charge, the ownership of the copyrights related to this ARTICLE to the Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debate, represented by FUNDAÇÃO OSWALDO CRUZ, established at Av. Brasil, nº 4365, Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, CEP 21045-900, under the conditions set out below: (a) The terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement shall apply to the following: 1. The ASSIGNOR declares that they s(he) is (are) the author (s) and owner (s) of the copyrighted property of the ARTICLE submitted. 2. The ASSIGNOR declares that the ARTICLE does not infringe the copyrights and / or other property rights of third parties, that the disclosure of images (if any) has been authorized and that they s(he) assume(s) full moral and / or property liability for its content, before third parties. 3. THE ASSIGNOR assigns and transfers all copyrights relating to the ARTICLE to the ASSIGNEE, especially the rights of editing, publication, translation into another language and reproduction by any process or technique. The ASSIGNEE becomes the exclusive owner of the rights related to the ARTICLE, and any reproduction, totally or partially, is prohibited in any other means of publicity, printed or electronic, without prior written authorization from the ASSIGNEE. 4. The assignment is free and, therefore, there will be no remuneration for the use of the ARTICLE by the ASSIGNEE.