Risco de tromboembolismo venoso associado ao uso de contraceptivos orais combinados em mulheres em idade fértil: uma revisão crítica de evidências
Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro, 2026, v.14: e02481| Publicado em: 04/02/2026
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22239/2317-269X.02481Palavras-chave:
Anticoncepcionais Orais Combinados, Tromboembolismo Venoso, Segurança do PacienteResumo
Introdução: O uso de anticoncepcionais orais combinados (COC) vem despertando preocupação quanto ao risco de tromboembolismo venoso (TEV) em mulheres em idade fértil. Geralmente eles contêm dois componentes: o estrogênio e uma variedade de progestágenos. Objetivo: Avaliar a segurança para TEV do uso de contraceptivos orais combinados em mulheres em idade fértil. Método: Revisão crítica de revisões sistemáticas (RS) com protocolo registrado na Open Science Framework, para responder ao objetivo de pesquisa. Resultados: Foram incluídas cinco RS. Brabaharan et al. (2022) encontraram um risco aumentado de TEV associado ao uso de COC contendo desogestrel em baixa dose, com tamanho do efeito de 2,05 (IC 95% 1,59–2,64). Wan-Lin Zhang et al. (2021) avaliaram COC com drospirenona (DRSP) em comparação com os que não continham DRSP (excluindo levonorgestrel), redução no risco de TEV, com hazard ratio (HR) ajustado de 0,76 (IC 95% 0,59–0,98). De Bastos et al. (2014) mostraram um risco aumentado de TEV ao comparar usuárias de COC com não usuárias: 1ª geração: razão de risco (RR) 3,2 (IC 95% 1,6–6,4); 2ª geração: RR 2,6 (IC 95% 1,5–4,7); 3ª geração: RR 3,5 (IC 95% 2,0–6,1). Stegeman et al. (2013), com estudo idêntico ao de De Bastos, mostraram risco relativo de 3,5 (IC 95% 2,9-4,3). A revisão de Peragallo Urrutia et al. (2013), odds ratio de 2,97 (IC 95% 2,46–3,59), ao comparar usuárias com não usuárias de COC. Conclusões: As evidências reunidas nas revisões sistemáticas analisadas indicam que o risco absoluto de TEV é baixo em mulheres jovens e saudáveis. No entanto, o risco relativo está presente especialmente com o uso de COC contendo estrogênio em doses mais altas ou progestágenos de 3ª e 4ª gerações. A influência de fatores de confusão como idade, índice de massa corporal e características individuais deve ser cuidadosamente considerada na interpretação dos dados.
Downloads
Referências
1. Haakenstad A, Angelino O, S Irvine CM, Bhutta ZA, Bienhoff K, Bintz C, et al. Measuring contraceptive method mix, prevalence, and demand satisfied by age and marital status in 204 countries and territories, 1970-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. www.thelancet.com [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 Sep 11];400. Available from: http://ghdx.healthdata.org/
2. Ponce De Leon G, Serruya SJ, Silveira MF, Barros AJD, Sanhueza A, Becerra-Posada F, et al. Contraceptive use in Latin America and the Caribbean with a focus on long-acting reversible contraceptives: prevalence and inequalities in 23 countries. Articles Lancet Glob Health [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2023 Sep 11];7:227–62. Available from: www.thelancet.com/lancetgh
3. Burch J, Cosmi B. How do different combined oral contraceptives compare in terms of the risk of venous thrombosis? Cochrane Clinical Answers [Internet]. 2016 Aug 3 [cited 2024 Feb 4]; Available from: https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cca/doi/10.1002/cca.933/full
4. Oedingen C, Scholz S, Razum O. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the association of combined oral contraceptives on the risk of venous thromboembolism: The role of the progestogen type and estrogen dose. Thromb Res [Internet]. 2018;165:68–78. Available from:[“https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L2000563535&from=export”,“http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2018.03.005”]
5. Kemmeren JM, Algra A, Meijers JCM, Tans G, Bouma BN, Curvers J, et al. Effect of second- and third-generation oral contraceptives on the protein C system in the absence or presence of the factor VLeiden mutation: A randomized trial. Blood. 2004;103(3):927–33.
6. Kemmeren JM, Algra A, Meijers JCM, Bouma BN, Grobbee DE. Effect of second- and third-generation oral contraceptives on fibrinolysis in the absence or presence of the factor V Leiden mutation. Blood Coagulation and Fibrinolysis. 2002;13(5):373–81.
7. Kemmeren JM, Algra A, Grobbee DE. Third generation oral contraceptives and risk of venous thrombosis: meta-analysis. BMJ [Internet]. 2001;323(7305):131–4. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC34722
8. Vandenbroucke JP, Rosing J, Blomenkamp KW, al. et. Oral contraceptives and the risk of venous thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1527–35.
9. Castoldi E, Rosing J. APC resistance: biological basis and acquired influences. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis [Internet]. 2010 Mar 1 [cited 2024 Jan 14];8(3):445–53.Available from: http://www.jthjournal.org/article/S153878362206737X/fulltext
10. Tans G, Van Hylckama Vlieg A, Thomassen MCLGD, Curvers J, Bertina RM, Rosing J, et al. Activated protein C resistance determined with a thrombin generation-based test predicts for venous thrombosis in men and women. Br J Haematol [Internet]. 2003 Aug 1 [cited 2024 Jan 14];122(3):465–70.Available from:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046/j.1365-2141.2003.04443.x
11. Kluft C, Meijer P, LaGuardia KD, Fisher AC. Comparison of a transdermal contraceptive patch vs. oral contraceptives on hemostasis variables. Contraception [Internet]. 2008 Feb 1[cited 2024 Jan 14];77(2):77–83.Available from:http://www.contraceptionjournal.org/article/S0010782407004568/fulltext
12. Sitruk-Ware R. New progestagens for contraceptive use. Hum Reprod Update [Internet]. 2006 Apr 1[cited 2024 Jan 14];12(2):169–78. Available from:https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmi046
13. Gomes MPV, Deitcher SR. Risk of Venous Thromboembolic Disease Associated With Hormonal Contraceptives and Hormone Replacement Therapy: A Clinical Review. Arch Intern Med [Internet]. 2004 Oct 11 [cited 2024 Jan 14];164(18):1965–76. Available from: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/217495
14. Jick SS, Hernandez RK. Risk of non-fatal venous thromboembolism in women using oral contraceptives containing drospirenone compared with women using oral contraceptives containing levonorgestrel: Case-control study using United States claims data. Bmj.2011;342(7804):1–8.
15. Lidegaard Ø, Nielsen L, Bmj CS, 2011 undefined. Risk of venous thromboembolism from use of oral contraceptives containing different progestogens and oestrogen doses: Danish cohort study, 2001-9. bmj.comØ Lidegaard, LH Nielsen, CW Skovlund, FE Skjeldestad, E LøkkegaardBmj, 2011•bmj.com [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 14]; Available from:https://sci-hub.do/https://www.bmj.com/content/343/bmj.d6423.pdf+html
16. Guang-Sheng F, Mei-Lu B, Li-Nan C, Xiao-Ming C, Zi-Rong H, Zi-Yan H, et al. Efficacy and Safety of the Combined Oral Contraceptive Ethinylestradiol/Drospirenone (Yasmin Ò ) in Healthy Chinese Women A Randomized, Open-Label, Controlled, Multicentre Trial. Vol. 30, Clin Drug Investig. 2010.
17. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71–n71.
18. Brabaharan S, Veettil SK, Kaiser JE, Raja Rao VR, Wattanayingcharoenchai R, Maharajan M, et al. Association of Hormonal Contraceptive Use With Adverse Health Outcomes: An Umbrella Review of Meta-analyses of Randomized Clinical Trials and Cohort Studies. JAMA Netw Open [Internet]. 2022 Jan 4 [cited 2023 Dec 28];5(1):e2143730–e2143730. Available from: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2788119
19. Zhang WL, Dong Z, Zhang JY, Lyu MZ, Zhang W, Huang JL, et al. Comparison of risks of thromboembolism of drospirenone containing and nondrospirenone - containing combined oral contraceptive use: A meta-analysis. Reproductive and Developmental Medicine [Internet]. 2021;5(3):154–60. Available from:https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L636167843&from=export
20. de Bastos M, Stegeman BH, Rosendaal FR, Van Hylckama Vlieg A, Helmerhorst FM, Stijnen T, et al. Combined oral contraceptives: Venous thrombosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2014 Mar 3;2014(3).
21. Peragallo Urrutia R, Coeytaux RR, McBroom AJ, Gierisch JM, Havrilesky LJ, Moorman PG, et al. Risk of acute thromboembolic events with oral contraceptive use:a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2013;122(2 Pt 1):380–9.
22. Stegeman BH, De Bastos M, Rosendaal FR, Van Hylckama Vlieg A, Helmerhorst FM, Stijnen T, et al. Different combined oral contraceptives and the risk of venous thrombosis: systematic review and network meta-analysis. The BMJ [Internet]. 2013 Sep 21 [cited 2024 Feb 3];347(7925). Available from:/pmc/articles/PMC3771677/
23. Bateson D, Butcher BE, Donovan C, Farrell L, Kovacs G, Mezzini T, et al. Risk of venous thromboembolism in women taking the combined oral contraceptive: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aust Fam Physician [Internet].2016;45(1):59–64. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84958225543&partnerID=40&md5=644570365f1f6702dfc968cfd5845a09
24. Martínez F, Ramrez I, Pérez-Campos E, Latorre K, Lete I. Venous and pulmonary thromboembolism and combined hormonal contraceptives. Systematic review and metaanalysis. European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care [Internet]. 2012;17(1):7–29. Available from:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-2.0-84855844752&doi=10.3109%2F13625187.2011.643836&partnerID=40&md5=b491bab9abbacb11877ce5e665f4c7db
25. Dragoman M V, Tepper NK, Fu R, Curtis KM, Chou R, Gaffield ME. A systematic review and meta-analysis of venous thrombosis risk among users of combined oral contraception. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics [Internet]. 2018;141(3):287–94. Available from:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-2.0-85042378999&doi=10.1002%2Fijgo.12455&partnerID=40&md5=b9f61945195fc989e0d94333549b793e
26. Gronich N, Lavi I, Rennert G. Higher risk of venous thrombosis associated with drospirenone-containing oral contraceptives: A population-based cohort study. CMAJ Canadian Medical Association Journal [Internet]. 2011 Dec 13 [cited 2024 Jan 14];183(18):E1319. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC3255137/
27. Bird S, Delaney J, Etminan M, … JBJ of T, 2013 undefined. Drospirenone and non-fatal venous thromboembolism: is there a risk difference by dosage of ethinyl-estradiol?Elsevier [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 14]; Available from:https://sci-hub.do/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1538783622176889
28. Hedenmalm K, … ESA obstetricia et, 2004 undefined. Pulmonary embolism associated with combined oral contraceptives: reporting incidences and potential risk factors for a fatal outcome. Taylor & FrancisK Hedenmalm, E Samuelsson, O SpigsetActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2004•Taylor & Francis [Internet]. 2004 Jun [cited 2024 Jan 14];83(6):576–85. Available from:https://sci-hub.do/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/j.0001-6349.2004.0533.x
29. Herings R, Urquhart J, Lancet HLT, 1999 undefined. Venous thromboembolism amng new users of different oral contraceptives. thelancet.comRMC Herings, J Urquhart, HGM LeufkensThe Lancet, 1999•thelancet.com [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 14]; Available from:https://sci-hub.do/https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS014067369901257X/fulltext
30. Samuelsson E, gynecologica SHA obstetricia et, 2004 undefined. Incidence of venous thromboembolism in young Swedish women and possibly preventable cases among combined oral contraceptive users. Taylor & FrancisE Samuelsson, S HäggActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2004•Taylor & Francis [Internet]. 2004 Jul [cited 2024 Jan 14];83(7):674–81. Available from:https://sci-hub.do/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/j.0001-6349.2004.00574.x
31. Farmer RDT, Preston TD. The risk of venous thromboembolism associated with low oestrogen oral contraceptives. J Obstet Gynaecol (Lahore) [Internet]. 1995 [cited 2024 Feb 1];15(3):195–200. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3109/01443619509015499
32. Farmer RDT, Lawrenson RA, Thompson CR, Kennedy JG, Hambleton IR. Population-based study of risk of venous thromboembolism associated with various oral contraceptives. The Lancet [Internet]. 1997;349(9045):83–8. Available from:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014067369607496X
33. Hannaford PC, Kay CR. The risk of serious illness among oral contraceptive users: evidence from the RCGP’s oral contraceptive study. The British Journal of General Practice [Internet]. 1998 [cited 2024 Feb 1];48(435):1657. Available from:/pmc/articles/PMC1313240/?report=abstract
34. Seeger J, Loughlin J, Eng P, … CCO&, 2007 undefined. Risk of thromboembolism in women taking ethinylestradiol/drospirenone
and other oral contraceptives. journals.lww.comJD Seeger, J Loughlin, PM Eng, CR Clifford, J Cutone, AM WalkerObstetrics & Gynecology, 2007•journals.lww.com [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 11]; Available from:https://sci-hub.do/https://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/fulltext/2007/09000/Risk_of_Thromboembolism_in_Women_Taking.9.aspx
35. Van Vlijmen EFW, Brouwer JLP, Veeger NJGM, Eskes TKAB, De Graeff PA, Van Der Meer J. Oral contraceptives and the absolute risk of venous thromboembolism in women with single or multiple thrombophilic defects: Results from a retrospective family cohort study. Arch Intern Med. 2007 Feb 12;167(3):282–9.
36. Lidegaard Ø, Løkkegaard E, Svendsen AL, Agger C. Hormonal contraception and risk of venous thromboembolism:national follow-up study. The BMJ [Internet]. 2009 Sep 5 [cited 2024 Feb 1];339(7720):557–60. Available from:/pmc/articles/PMC2726928/
37. Van Vlijmen EFW, Veeger NJGM, Middeldorp S, Hamulyák K, Prins MH, Büller HR, et al. Thrombotic risk during oral contraceptive use and pregnancy in women with factor V Leiden or prothrombin mutation: a rational approach to contraception. Blood. 2011 Aug 25;118(8):2055–61.
38. Dinger J, Bardenheuer K, Contraception KH, 2014 undefined. Cardiovascular and general safety of a 24-day regimen of drospirenone-containing combined oral contraceptives: final results from the International Active. Elsevier [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 11]; Available from:https://sci-hub.do/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001078241400033X?casa_token=qghJXZlWW_oAAAAA:eUSU0wKowCvMeAUI8s2mHrV7me7_HqrweYg7RdY92v1LpinqC-IXHsRbvV7L_uTDLzuT54rKgg
39. Dinger J, Möhner S, Contraception KH, 2016 undefined. Cardiovascular risks associated with the use of drospirenone-containing combined oral contraceptives. Elsevier [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 11]; Available from:https://sci-hub.do/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010782416000329?casa_token=z2BM3clZjUgAAAAA:i4h33OjfZcIT_tQBmYaiYFll1V21_uKsOKmIANz0nFSfuUV8fXzVR-Wt2rQx1FLo7KgMYRigSQ
40. Farmer R, Lewis M, Van Lunsen RHW, Cohen J, Vandenbroucke JP, Bloemenkamp KWM, et al. Oral contraceptives and mortality from venous thromboembolism [1]. Lancet [Internet]. 1996 Oct 19 [cited 2024 Jan 14];348(9034):1095–7. Available from:http://www.thelancet.com/article/S0140673696240425/fulltext
41. Farmer RDT, Lawrenson RA, Todd JC, Williams TJ, Macrae KD, Tyrer F, et al. A comparison of the risks of venous thromboembolic disease in association with different combined oral contraceptives. Wiley Online LibraryRDT Farmer, RA Lawrenson, JC Todd, TJ Williams, KD MacRae, F Tyrer, GM LeydonBritish journal of clinical pharmacology, 2000•Wiley Online Library [Internet]. 2000 [cited 2024 Jan 14];49(6):580–90. Available from:https://sci-hub.do/https://bpspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1046/j.1365-2125.2000.00198.x
42. Grodstein F, Stampfer MJ, Goldhaber SZ, Manson JAE, Colditz GA, Speizer FE, et al. Prospective study of exogenous hormones and risk of pulmonary embolism in women. The Lancet. 1996 Oct 12;348(9033):983–7.
43. Conard J, Plu-Bureau G, Bahi N, Horellou MH, Pelissier C, Thalabard JC. Progestogen-only contraception in women at high risk of venous thromboembolism. Contraception [Internet]. 2004 Dec [cited 2024 Feb 1];70(6):437–41. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15541404/
44. Le Gal G, Kovacs MJ, Carrier M, Do K, Kahn SR, Wells PS, et al. Risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism after a first oestrogen-associated episode. Data from the REVERSE cohort study. Thromb Haemost [Internet]. 2010 Sep [cited 2024 Feb 1];104(3):498–503. Available from:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20539910/
45. Todd J, Lawrenson R, … RFH, 1999 undefined. Venous thromboembolic disease and combined oral contraceptives: a re-analysis of the MediPlus database. academic.oup.comJC Todd, R Lawrenson, RDT Farmer, TJ Williams, GM LeydonHuman Reproduction, 1999•academic.oup.com [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 14]; Available from:https://sci-hub.do/https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article-abstract/14/6/1500/2919262
46. Dinger JC, Heinemann LAJ, Kqhl-Habich D. The safety of a drospirenone-containing oral contraceptive: final results from the European Active Surveillance study on Oral Contraceptives based on 142,475 women-years of observation. Contraception. 2007;75:344–54.
47. Meade TW. Risks and mechanisms of cardiovascular events in users of oral contraceptives. Am J Obstet Gynecol.1988;158(6):1646–52.
48. FYFE S. Hormonal contraceptives and adverse effects: What’s the evidence? CONTEMPORARY OB/GYN; Monmouth Junction. 2023;68(3):23.
49. DeLoughery T. Review: Contemporary oral contraceptives are associated with venous thromboembolism and stroke. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Dec 17;159(12).
50. Lidegaard. Severely biased review of studies assessing the risk of venous thrombosis in users of drospirenone-containing oral contraceptives. BJOG. 2018;125(8):929–31.
51. Larivée N, Suissa S, Khosrow-Khavar F, Tagalakis V, Filion KB. Drospirenone-containing oral contraceptive pills and the risk of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review of observational studies. BJOG [Internet]. 2017;124(10):1490–9. Available from:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85019015980&doi=10.1111%2F1471-0528.14623&partnerID=40&md5=fd69a450b53fd874b089fe91598a3397
52. Solymoss S. Risk of venous thromboembolism with oral contraceptives. CMAJ [Internet].2011 Dec 13 [cited 2025 Mar 27];183(18):E1278–9. Available from:https://www.cmaj.ca/content/183/18/E1278
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Categorias
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
TERMO DE CESSÃO DE DIREITOS AUTORAIS O(s) autor(es) doravante designado(s) CEDENTE, por meio desta, cede e transfere, de forma gratuita, a propriedade dos direitos autorais relativos à OBRA à REVISTA Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debate e, representada por FUNDAÇÃO OSWALDO CRUZ, estabelecida na Av. Brasil, nº 4365, Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil, CEP 21045-900, doravante designada CESSIONÁRIA, nas condições descritas a seguir: 1. O CEDENTE declara que é (são) autor(es) e titular(es) da propriedade dos direitos autorais da OBRA submetida. 2. O CEDENTE declara que a OBRA não infringe direitos autorais e/ou outros direitos de propriedade de terceiros, que a divulgação de imagens (caso as mesmas existam) foi autorizada e que assume integral responsabilidade moral e/ou patrimonial, pelo seu conteúdo, perante terceiros. 3. O CEDENTE cede e transfere todos os direitos autorais relativos à OBRA à CESSIONÁRIA, especialmente os direitos de edição, de publicação, de tradução para outro idioma e de reprodução por qualquer processo ou técnica. A CESSIONÁRIA passa a ser proprietária exclusiva dos direitos referentes à OBRA, sendo vedada qualquer reprodução, total ou parcial, em qualquer outro meio de divulgação, impresso ou eletrônico, sem que haja prévia autorização escrita por parte da CESSIONÁRIA. 4. A cessão é gratuita e, portanto, não haverá qualquer tipo de remuneração pela utilização da OBRA pela CESSIONÁRIA.



