Oviposition of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus: a study in Santarém, Pará, Brazil
Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro, 2025, v.13: e02395| Published on: 16/12/2025
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22239/2317-269X.02395Keywords:
Aedes, Mosquito Control, Dengue, Amazon EcosystemAbstract
Introduction: Ovitraps are widely used traps for detecting and monitoring the oviposition of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus, notable for their high sensitivity, low cost, and ease of use. Objective: To evaluate the oviposition of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in ovitraps installed on a university campus located in the city of Santarém, Pará, Brazilian Amazon. Method: A field study was conducted between November 2023 and February 2024 at the Federal University of Western Pará (UFOPA). The ovitraps used to detect species of the genus Aedes were made with dark plastic containers, Eucatex® straws, and an attractive solution and were installed in two distinct seasonal periods (dry and rainy) in the study area.
A total of 19 traps were set up, and meteorological data on precipitation and temperature were obtained from the National Institute of Meteorology (INMET). Based on the results, the Ovitrap Positivity Index (IPO) and the Egg Density Index (IDO) were calculated. Results: A total of 3,553 eggs of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus were collected, of which 592 were recorded in the dry season and 2,961 in the rainy season. The IPO ranged from 47.4% to 100.0%, while the EDI ranged from 29.2 to 62.5. Conclusions: The ovitraps proved effective in detecting eggs of the two target species, indicating the continuous presence of females throughout both climatic periods, with a predominance in the rainy season.
Downloads
References
1. Silva MGNM, Rodrigues MAB, Araujo RE. Sistema de aquisição e processamento de imagens de ovitrampas para o combate à dengue. Rev Bras Eng Biomed. 2012;28(4):364-74.https://doi.org/10.4322/rbeb.2012.043
2. Magalhaes T, Chalegre KDM, Braga C, Foy BD. The endless challenges of arboviral diseases in Brazil. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2020;5(2):1-6. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed5020075
3. Lwande OW, Obanda V, Lindström A, Ahlm C, Evander M, Näslund J et al. Globe-trotting Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus: risk factors for arbovirus pandemics. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2020;20(2):71-81.https://doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2019.2486
4. Lordão DBMAV, Salaroli R, Silva LA, Sá RRB, Medina NCSS, Bispo CV S et al. Avaliação de novos casos de dengue no sudeste entre 2016 e 2024 um estudo ecológico. Braz J Impl Health Sci. 2024;6(5):1534-48.https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2024v6n5p1534-1548
5. Sukupayo PR, Poudel RC, Ghimire TR. Nature’s solution to Aedes vectors: toxorhynchites as a biocontrol agent. J Trop Med. 2024;2024:1-10.https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/3529261
6. World Health Organization – WHO. Dengue: global situation. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023[acesso 25 out 2024]. Disponível em:https://www.who.int/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/item/2023-DON498
7. Puntasecca CJ, King CH, LaBeaud AD. Measuring the global burden of chikungunya and Zika viruses: a systematic review. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021;15(3):1-18.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009055
8. Oliveira FP, Stoffella-Dutra AG, Barbosa CG, Costa GB, Oliveira JS, Amara AD et al. Re-emergência da febre amarela no Brasil durante 2016-2019: desafios, lições aprendidas e perspectivas.Viruses. 2020;12(11):1-15.https://doi.org/10.3390/v12111233
9. Deng SQ, Yang X, Wei Y, Chen JT, Wang XJ, Peng HJ. A review on dengue vaccine development. Vaccines.2020;8(1):1-23.https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines8010063
10. Monath TP. Yellow fever vaccine. Exp Rev Vacc.2005;4(4):553-74.https://doi.org/10.1586/14760584.4.4.553
11. Barrera R. New tools for Aedes control: mass trapping. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2022;52:1-7.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2022.100942
12. Resende MC, Silva IM, Ellis BR. A comparison of larval, ovitrap and MosquiTRAP surveillance for Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2013;108(8):1024-30.https://doi.org/10.1590/0074-0276130128
13. Custódio JMO, Nogueira LMS, Souza DA, Fernandes MF, Oshiro ET, Oliveria EF et al. Abiotic factors and population dynamic of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in an endemic area of dengue in Brazil. Rev Inst Med Trop São Paulo. 2019;61:1-9.https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-9946201961018
14. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Dengue: aspectos epidemiológicos, diagnóstico e tratamento. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2002.
15. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Programa nacional de controle da dengue: amparo legal à execução das ações de campo: imóveis fechados, abandonados ou com acesso não permitido pelo morador. 2a. ed. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2006.
16. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Nota técnica Nº 33/2022 CGARB/DEIDT/SVS/MS: Recomendações para a implementação da vigilância entomológica com armadilhas de oviposição (ovitrampas), para o direcionamento e monitoramento de ações de controle de mosquitos das espécies Aedes aegyp e/ou Aedes albopictus. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2022[acesso 23 out 2024]. Disponível em:https://saude.rs.gov.br/upload/arquivos/202212/14131027-nota-tecnica-ms-n-33-2022-ovitrampas.pdf
17. Acioli RV. O uso de armadilhas de oviposição (ovitrampas) como ferramenta para monitoramento populacional do Aedes spp em bairros do Recife [dissertações de mestrado]. Recife: Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, 2006.
18. Ministério da Agricultura e Pecuária (BR). Análises Meteorológicas. Brasília: Ministério da Agricultura e Pecuária; 2024[acesso 23 set 2024]. Disponível em:http://www.inmet.gov.br/portal/index.php?r=bdmep/bdmep
19. Secretaria Estadual de Saúde do Pará – SES-PA. Chave ilustrada para a identificação de Aedes aegypti e Aedes albopictus. Belém: Secretaria Estadual de Saúde do Pará; 2009.
20. Gomes AC. Medidas dos níveis de infestação urbana para Aedes (stegomyia) Aegypti e Aedes (stegomyia) albopictus em programa de vigilância entomológica. Inf Epidemiol Sus. 1998;7(3):49-57.https://doi.org/10.5123/S0104-16731998000300006
21. Figueiredo RMP, Naveca FG, Oliveira CM. Co-infection of Dengue virus by serotypes 3 and 4 in patients from Amazonas, Brazil. Rev Inst Med Trop São Paulo. 2011;53(6):321-3.https://doi.org/10.1590/S0036-46652011000600004
22. Facchinelli L, Badolo A, McCall PJ. Biology and behaviour of Aedes aegypti in the human environment: opportunities for vector control of arbovirus transmission. Viruses.2023;15(3):1-19.https://doi.org/10.3390/v15030636
23. Cordeiro JU. Estudo da eficácia de uma armadilha para o monitoramento do mosquito Aedes aegypti (Diptera:Culicidae) [dissertação de mestrado]. São Paulo:Universidade de São Paulo; 2021.
24. Espinal MA, Andrus JK, Jauregui B, Waterman SH, Morens DM, Santos JI et al. Emerging and reemerging Aedes-transmitted arbovirus infections in the region of the americas: implications for health policy. Am J Public Health. 2019;109(3):387-92.https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304849
25. Souza-Neto JA, Powell JR, Bonizzoni M. Estudos de competência do vetor Aedes aegypti: uma revisão. Infect Genet Evol. 2019;67:191-209.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2018.11.009
26. Lima-Camara TN, Honório NA, Lourenço OR. Frequência e distribuição espacial de Aedes aegypti e Aedes albopictus (Diptera, Culicidae) no Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Cad Saúde Pública. 2006;22(10):2079-84.https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2006001000013
27. Paupy C, Delatte H, Bagny L, Corbel V, Fontenille D. Aedes albopictus, an arbovirus vector: from the darkness to the light. Microbes Infect. 2009;11(14-15):1177-85.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2009.05.005
28. Kraemer MUG, Sinka ME, Duda KA, Mylne AQN, et al. The global distribution of the arbovirus vectors Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus. eLife. 2015;4:1-18.https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.08347
29. Laporta GZ, Potter AM, Oliveira JFA, Bourke BP, Pecor DB, Linton YM. Distribuição global de Aedes aegypti e Aedes albopictus em um cenário de mudança climática de rivalidade regional. Insects. 2023;14(1):1-18.https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14010049
30. Fernandes CM. Mapeamento da infestação por Aedes aegypti e Culex spp. adultos em Campinas (SP), Brasil [dissertação de mestrado]. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo; 2024.
31. Rosa-Silva H, Cardoso JG, Reis-Júnior R, Corgosinho PHC, Faria ML, Ribeiro SP et al. Coexistence and spatial distribution of invasive and sylvatic container-breeding mosquitoes in city–forest ecotone within the brazilian semi-arid. Diversity.2023;15(7):1-12.https://doi.org/10.3390/d15070822
32. Ribeiro AF, Marques GRAM, Voltolini JC, Condino MLF. Associação entre incidência de dengue e variáveis climáticas. Rev Saúde Pública. 2006;40(4):671-6.https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102006000500017
33. Peixoto TM, Cerqueira EM, Andrade JN, Coelho MMP. Práticas educativas no controle da dengue: atuação dos agentes de combate às endemias e percepção dos moradores. Revisa. 2020;9(2):262-70.
34. Mackay AJ, Yan J, Kim CH, Barreaux AMG, Stone CM. Larval diet and temperature alter mosquito immunity and development: using body size and developmental traits to track carry-over effects on longevity. Parasit Vectors.2023;16:1-3.https://doi.org/10.1186/13071-023-06037-z
35. Beserra EB, Fernandes CRM, Silva SUO. Efeitos da temperatura no ciclo de vida, exigências térmicas e estimativas do número de gerações anuais de Aedes aegypti (Diptera, Culicidae). Iheringia Ser Zool. 2009;99(2):142-8.https://doi.org/10.1590/0073-47212009000200004
36. Jiménez-Alejo A, Morales-Pérez A, Nava-Aguilera E, Flores-Moreno M, Apreza-Aguilar S, Carranza-Alcaraz W et al. Pupal productivity in rainy and dry seasons: findings from the impact survey of a randomised controlled trial of dengue prevention in Guerrero, Mexico. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(Suppl.1):1-8.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4294-8
37. Barreto E, Resende MC, Eiras AE. Avaliação da armadilha ovitrampas iscada com atraente natural para monitoramento de Aedes spp. em Dilli, capital do Timor-Leste. Cienc Saúde Colet. 2020;5(2):665-72.https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232020252.12512018
38. Silva RW. Análise da estrutura populacional de mosquitos Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) em diferentes estratos urbanos na cidade de São Paulo, utilizando morfometria geométrica alar e marcadores microssatélites [dissertação de mestrado]. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo; 2017.
39. Barbosa EP. Diversidade morfológica de Aedes aegypti: transecto entre o porto de Santos e noroeste do Estado de São Paulo [monografia]. São Paulo: Instituto Butantã; 2022.
40. Baik LS, Nave C, Au DD, Guda T, Chevez JA, Ray A et al. Circadian regulation of light-evoked attraction and avoidance behaviors in daytime- versus nighttimebiting mosquitoes. Curr Biol. 2020;17;30(16):3252-9.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.06.010
41. Farnesi LC, Barbosa CS, Araripe LO, Bruno RV. The influence of a light and dark cycle on the egg laying activity of Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus, 1762) (Diptera: Culicidae). Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2018;113(4):1-6.https://doi.org/10.1590/0074-02760170362
42. Menda G, Nitzany EI, Shamble PS, Wells A, Harrington LC, Miles RN et al. The long and short of hearing in the mosquito Aedes aegypti. Current Biology. 2019;29(4):709-14.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.01.026.
Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
COPYRIGHT ALLOWANCE The author (s) hereinafter designated as the ASSIGNOR hereby assign and transfer, free of charge, the ownership of the copyrights related to this ARTICLE to the Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debate, represented by FUNDAÇÃO OSWALDO CRUZ, established at Av. Brasil, nº 4365, Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, CEP 21045-900, under the conditions set out below: (a) The terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement shall apply to the following: 1. The ASSIGNOR declares that they s(he) is (are) the author (s) and owner (s) of the copyrighted property of the ARTICLE submitted. 2. The ASSIGNOR declares that the ARTICLE does not infringe the copyrights and / or other property rights of third parties, that the disclosure of images (if any) has been authorized and that they s(he) assume(s) full moral and / or property liability for its content, before third parties. 3. THE ASSIGNOR assigns and transfers all copyrights relating to the ARTICLE to the ASSIGNEE, especially the rights of editing, publication, translation into another language and reproduction by any process or technique. The ASSIGNEE becomes the exclusive owner of the rights related to the ARTICLE, and any reproduction, totally or partially, is prohibited in any other means of publicity, printed or electronic, without prior written authorization from the ASSIGNEE. 4. The assignment is free and, therefore, there will be no remuneration for the use of the ARTICLE by the ASSIGNEE.




