POST-MARKETING SURVEILLANCE; REGULATORY IMPACT; AND TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22239/jr1b0q14

Keywords:

dffdfd

Abstract

The thematic series "Evidence Synthesis for Health Regulation" is an initiative of the Evidence for Health Policies and Technologies Program (PEPTS), which, through technical cooperation established with the National Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA), developed a set of evidence syntheses that resulted in the articles presented here.

This initiative is made possible with the essential support of the Visa in Debate Journal, which, in synergy with the institutional mission of those involved, aims to publicize and disseminate the knowledge produced, so that it reaches professionals working in the field of health surveillance and regulation, as well as others interested in the subject.

The publication addresses essential topics to broaden the debate on emerging and re-emerging issues that are on the daily agenda of management in health surveillance and regulation. With this, it intends to foster reflections on the use of the best available evidence, whether from the literature or from national and international experiences, whose potential applies to guiding regulatory decisions in Brazil.

The thematic series includes three diverse sections: Post-marketing Surveillance; Regulatory Impact; and Technological Innovation, and publishes original articles and scoping reviews, in Portuguese and English, and is distributed digitally.

The Editors wish you a great reading experience!

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Published

2026-02-06

How to Cite

POST-MARKETING SURVEILLANCE; REGULATORY IMPACT; AND TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION. (2026). Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology , 14, 1-2. https://doi.org/10.22239/jr1b0q14