Editorial - Post-marketing surveillance – Monitoring, technovigilance and pharmacovigilance

Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro, 2026, v.14: e02602| Published on: 2026-02-04

Authors

  • Flávia Tavares Silva Elias Author
  • Margarete Martins de Oliveira Author
  • Maria Glória Vicente Author
  • Stela Candioto Melchior Author
  • Viviane Cássia Pereira Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22239/2317-269X.02602

Keywords:

Vigilância pós-comercialização, Monitoramento, Tecnovigilância, Farmacovigilância

Abstract

This section of the Visa in Debate Journal will present evidence to support post-marketing surveillance of regulated technologies, such as medicines, food, medical devices (equipment, materials for use in health and in vitro diagnostics), results of strategic studies produced in cooperation between the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation Brasília (Fiocruz Brasília) and the National Health Surveillance Agency (Anvisa). This cooperation aims to produce evidence that can support the regulatory decision-making process and, as a teaching and research institution, Fiocruz Brasília has an interest in disseminating the results from the studies.

________________________________________________________________
1 PROJETO GEREB-005-FIO-21 “Support for actions for the development of regulation and health surveillance".

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária – Anvisa. Monitoramento pós-mercado. Boletim Informativo Vigipós vol. 4. dez 2022[acesso 16 set 2024].Disponível em: https://www.gov.br/anvisa/pt-br/centraisdeconteudo/publicacoes/monitoramento/boletinsmonitoramento-pos-mercado/boletim-monitoramento-4oedicao-2022.pdf

2. Melchior SC. Vigilância pós-comercialização de produtos para saúde: questões sobre organização, gestão e implantação no Sistema Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária [tese]. Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Oswaldo Cruz; 2020[acesso 16 set 2024]. Disponível em:https://arca.fiocruz.br/handle/icict/46211

3. Silva RE, Amato AA, Sousa T,Carvalho MR, Novaes MRCG. The patient’s safety and access to experimental drugs after the termination of clinical trials: regulations and trends. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2018;74:1001-10.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-018-2474-9

4. Harrison RK. Phase II and phase III failures: 2013-2015. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2016;15(12):817-8.https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd.2016.184

5. Fleming TR, DeMets DL, Roe MT, Wittes J, Calis KA, Vora AN et al. Data monitoring committees: promoting best practices to address emerging challenges. Clin Trials. 2017;14(2):115-23.https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774516688915

Published

2026-02-06

Issue

Section

POST-MARKETING SURVEILLANCE

Categories

How to Cite

Editorial - Post-marketing surveillance – Monitoring, technovigilance and pharmacovigilance: Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro, 2026, v.14: e02602| Published on: 2026-02-04. (2026). Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology , 14, 1-2. https://doi.org/10.22239/2317-269X.02602

Most read articles by the same author(s)