Local Lymph node assay in the differentiation between an allergic contact dermatitis and irritation: study of the expression of T lymphocyte surface markers

Authors

  • Bárbara Andréa Fortes dos Santos Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ Author
  • Edson Roberto Alves de Oliveira Instituto de Química, Centro de Tecnologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ Author
  • Marciano Viana Paes Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (IOC/Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, RJ Author
  • Fabio Coelho Amendoeira Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (INCQS/Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, RJ Author
  • Isabella Fernandes Delgado Vice-Presidência de Educação, Informação e Comunicação, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, RJ Author
  • Ana Cristina Martins de Almeida Nogueira Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (IOC/Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, RJ Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22239/2317-269X.01088

Keywords:

Contact Dermatitis, LLNA, Alternative Method, Sanitary Surveillance

Abstract

Introduction: The Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA) was developed as an alternative to Buhler and Maximization assays. It is applied to discriminate substances that are able to induce contact dermatitis and the endpoint is cell quantification in mice auricular lymph nodes. Although recommended by international agencies involved in the development of alternative methodologies, LLNA still needs to be improved. Objective: In this context, the goal of this study was to investigate possible differences in lymphocyte subpopulation patterns among mice treated with irritants and dermosensitizers. Method: Animals were treated with sensitizers dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB) and paraphenylenediamine (PPD) and irritants sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) and tritonX-100 (TX-100) for 3 days, using dorsum area of both ears. The percentage of different lymphocyte subpopulations were analyzed by flow cytometry. Ears of animals were also evaluated for possible pathological alterations. Results: Differences were observed in CD4+ CD25+ and CD4+ CD69+ cells, as well as in the proliferation of these subpopulations. The histopathological analysis of the ears showed no difference between the treatment with either dermosensitizers or irritants. Conclusions: T lymphocyte phenotyping might still be a useful tool in the development of an assay to differentiate between dermosensitizers and irritants. Moreover, these results may contribute to improving knowledge on this field and helping in the search of a correlate in vitro assay.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Ana Cristina Martins de Almeida Nogueira, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (IOC/Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, RJ
    Imunologia com enfase em imunidade inata e aplicada a viglância sanitária.

Published

2018-08-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Local Lymph node assay in the differentiation between an allergic contact dermatitis and irritation: study of the expression of T lymphocyte surface markers. (2018). Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology , 6(3), 54-63. https://doi.org/10.22239/2317-269X.01088

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>